So with the Mac mini, I would need an eGPU anyway. I do not need 4K gaming or anything like that. As long as I can do 2560x1440 at 120+ fps on my 144 Hz display, I am fine. Games like Borderlands (including the new one coming out), Factorio, Terraria, Doom 2016, and GTA5 to name a few. I DO plan to do some light gaming on this by booting into Windows. Especially since I can get a similar specced iMac (without Xeon and ECC memory, but core count) and have it a couple thousand cheaper WITH 1TB SSD is very desirable.
#TOM'S HARDWARE REVIEW FOR MAC MINI 2017 PRO#
The new Mac Pro is obviously out of my price range at the moment.
So maybe the Mac Mini with the T2 chip is better? However, I think FCPX is more bursty so higher amount of speed is better than core count right? I am not a fan of the built in graphics of the Mac mini. I do very little 4K stuff, most of my content is still 1080p.
I do a lot of Logic Pro and Final Cut Pro X. I prefer to use my own monitors and am free to hook up a 144 Hz display for some gaming. And my 2017 iMac does have a display issue which means my entire computer needs to be sent in. It has such massive borders around the display too. No height adjustment and it is very tall. I have to be honest, I am not a fan of the iMac's display. The Mac mini still has weaker processors now compared to the latest iMac. I am having a very tough time deciding which system to get to replace my 2017 iMac.
0 kommentar(er)
